On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mit, 2012-11-14 at 12:39 -0500, [email protected] wrote:
>> From: Jerome Glisse <[email protected]>
>>
>> We might get a request for a pixmap/drawable that is too big
>> for GPU capabilities in the dri2 get buffer path. In face of
>> such things just return NULL to dri2 get buffer request. The
>> GL driver should then use something like transparent black to
>> avoid something too ugly on the screen.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  src/radeon_dri2.c | 4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/radeon_dri2.c b/src/radeon_dri2.c
>> index ebd813c..919f1f6 100644
>> --- a/src/radeon_dri2.c
>> +++ b/src/radeon_dri2.c
>> @@ -444,6 +444,10 @@ radeon_dri2_create_buffer2(ScreenPtr pScreen,
>>           info->exa_force_create = TRUE;
>>           exaMoveInPixmap(pixmap);
>>           info->exa_force_create = FALSE;
>> +         if (exaGetPixmapDriverPrivate(pixmap) == NULL) {
>> +             /* this happen if pixmap is non accelerable */
>> +             goto error;
>> +         }
>>       }
>>
>>       if (is_glamor_pixmap)
>
> Does radeon_dri2_create_buffers() need similar treatment? Otherwise
>
> Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <[email protected]>
>

I was thinking of removing it afaict it only get use on quite old xserver.

Cheers,
Jerome
_______________________________________________
xorg-driver-ati mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati

Reply via email to