On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> wrote: > > 1. Mimic the behaviour with a running CRTC as closely as possible > 2. Don't bother, just always wait for a fixed amount of time, say > some fraction of a second > > I fail to see the point of a flawed compromise. >
Wasn't my first patch series (the one where I always waited nominal_vblank_period) implementing option 2? If constant wait time is acceptable, I can go back to the first patch series and simplify it even further (e.g., forget nominal_vblank_period and just wait for some fixed hard-coded time). That would address my original objective (i.e. avoid dissipating extra power when we turn off the screen) and would be very simple. If that is not acceptable, and you insist on option 1, then I agree, my second patch series needs more work. -- Ilija _______________________________________________ xorg-driver-ati mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
