On Die, 2013-04-30 at 17:34 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Die, 2013-04-30 at 10:31 -0400, Ilija Hadzic wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > On Son, 2013-04-28 at 16:07 -0400, Ilija Hadzic wrote: > > > > > > The end result is that regardless in which state the display > > is, the > > > application sees the events (time and sequence numbers) that > > progress > > > as if the CRTC is running and the events happen at right > > time points > > > on the grid determined by the vlbanks (real or > > interpolated). > > > > > > Indeed, looks like DPMS off no longer has any effect on piglit > > results. :) Thanks for working on this. > > > > > > > > Forgive me if this question is going to make me look dumb, but given > > that piglit is a rendering test suite, the behavior you are seeing is > > expected. In other words, you are not implying that something is > > wrong, are you? > > Indeed, I'm not. piglit has a few GLX tests, some of which could > previously fail when the monitor was in DPMS off state. Your series > fixes that.
Hmm, now I've seen some issues with some glx/GLX_OML_sync_control/ tests again even with your patches. Maybe the CRTC went off while those tests were running, and that isn't handled quite correctly yet. Can you look into that? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer _______________________________________________ xorg-driver-ati mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
