I agree. There is even more radical but reasonable solution: remove --disable-glamor a fail if glamor is missing. There are people who don't know what glamor is and this should make the decision easier for them.
Marek On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 16:30 +0200, Marek Olšák wrote: >> I think it's better to fail and force a user to use --disable-glamor >> (or install glamor) than silently succeed without any acceleration for >> SI. > > Maybe, but then it would be clearer to make the default 'yes' instead of > 'auto'. :) > > > -- > Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com > Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer > _______________________________________________ xorg-driver-ati mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
