https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92045
--- Comment #11 from Andy Furniss <[email protected]> --- (In reply to charlie from comment #9) > I don't know what you mean by, "as AFAIK you get newer/different/better? > glamor over using the "old" driver/glamor." Do you mean I don't have to > compile "driver/glamor" if I build xserver with "--enable-glamor" flag which > is the newer method of building X? I will try it now. Yes AFAIK. If you have Xorg.0.logs before and after you should be able to see a difference in module version like - grep glamoregl /var/log/Xorg.0.log -A 1 [ 23.286] (II) LoadModule: "glamoregl" [ 23.332] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so [ 23.450] (II) Module glamoregl: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 23.450] compiled for 1.17.99, module version = 1.0.0 I don't have an old log, but IIRC if you are using the driver/glamor you will see a different/lower version. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/glamor/log/ shows no updates for > a year. As for your dp res issue - I can't help there, I have a different card + no dp monitor to test. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ xorg-driver-ati mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
