On 29.10.2015 14:34, Jammy Zhou wrote:
> Do present immediately in this case.
> 
> v2: fix the overflow
> 
> Change-Id: I25b9212169ccbf572b88c033dc09c0ac5cfa4812
> Signed-off-by: Jammy Zhou <[email protected]>
> ---
>  src/amdgpu_present.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/src/amdgpu_present.c b/src/amdgpu_present.c
> index 5e5ed72..b9cc1c7 100644
> --- a/src/amdgpu_present.c
> +++ b/src/amdgpu_present.c
> @@ -160,6 +160,16 @@ amdgpu_present_queue_vblank(RRCrtcPtr crtc, uint64_t 
> event_id, uint64_t msc)
>       struct amdgpu_drm_queue_entry *queue;
>       drmVBlank vbl;
>       int ret;
> +     uint64_t crtc_ust, crtc_msc;
> +
> +     ret = amdgpu_present_get_ust_msc(crtc, &crtc_ust, &crtc_msc);
> +     if (ret != Success)
> +             return ret;
> +
> +     if (crtc_msc >= msc) {
> +             present_event_notify(event_id, crtc_ust, crtc_msc);
> +             return Success;
> +     }

If crtc_msc >= msc, the DRM_IOCTL_WAIT_VBLANK ioctl should generate the
userspace event immediately, so I'm not sure anymore why this patch
would make any difference. Can you provide more details about what
exactly happens with and without this patch?


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer               |               http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast             |             Mesa and X developer
_______________________________________________
xorg-driver-ati mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati

Reply via email to