Peter Hutterer wrote: > The difference to the current implementation is that there is no > meta-information about the property. This information included immutable, > client-created, range and pending. I deem all four as too much information. > > If such information is required in the future, such requests can be added > easily in future versions of XInput. I guess you are just not exposing those? My concern is that a client could remove properties installed by the server or a driver.
In the readonly case, I think it should be possible to tell a property which refuses to be set due to the value apart from a property which generally is 'read-only', i.e. has a always-fail setter or some unexposed flag. Could be BadValue vs. BadMatch, but I'm missing it in the ChangeDeviceProperty spec (readonly is arguably a type mismatch). Otherwise, I'm fine. Cheers, Simon _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
