On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 10:11 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: >> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 18:41 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> > Generally, if DRI2CopyRegion seriously wants to be useful for >> > synchronization purposes, it probably needs to provide at least the same >> > functionality as the DRM vblank related ioctls. >> >> Certainly the combination of DRI2CopyRegion and DRM should be able to >> provide sufficient synchronization. The question is what portion of this >> task belongs in the extension and what portion belongs in the DRM kernel >> API. > > If the GLX implementation is to use DRI2CopyRegion for synchronization > purposes, then the interface of the latter needs to be at least as > expressive as the DRM synchronization interfaces currently used by the > former.
Could you give a quick summary of what those are and where you think DRI2CopyRegion falls short? Kristian _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
