Matthias Hopf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ATOMs are obviously supported, but FLOATs seem harder as they aren't > > described in the core protocol anywhere. > > Thinking about that, adding floats was probably a bull idea. However, > having semantics about ATOMs might be helpful (e.g. for xrandr or any > general purpose property setting tool).
We may need them in XRender as well to support higher-precision coordinates and transformations. They could be specified by just referencing IEEE 754. Soren _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
