From: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 21:05:46 +1100
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 01:39:32AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > From: "Nicolas Mailhot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:49:29 +0100 (CET) > > > > > Ironically fontconfig was adopted in large part because the core fonts > > > system had major problems with internationalization. > > > > Ironically you didn't read my posting. > > Ironically, you didn't read the threads about it. If you did, you'd > see that it was done to reduce the fragility of the build and indeed to > make life easier for the people who often hit this as one of the first > problems, to the point where it was an FAQ though. > > I guess the term irony is thrown around too easily. I did read it. It's about people who are unhappy with a new HAL input layer default. A default that, btw, anti-socially totally ignores what people put into their xorg.conf file unless they add yet another knob. That's worse than a default change. _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
