Sami Farin wrote on Friday, January 16, 2009 2:29 AM: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 17:24:10 +0800, Jin, Gordon wrote: >> Tino Keitel wrote on Friday, January 09, 2009 3:45 AM: >>> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 16:04:55 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: >>>> >>>> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.5.99.2 >>> >>> I'd like to know how/what can/should be tested before the release. >>> What versions of kernel/xserver/mesa/drm/whatever are required? And >>> for what features (XvMC, UXA, DRI, DRI2, GEM, KMS, etc.), and what >>> chips can use which features? >> >> Tino, >> >> Thanks for the question, and sorry for my late reply. >> >> In general, the release component info is maintained at >> http://intellinuxgraphics.org/download.html. >> So at that page you can find a recommended package (what we call >> 2008Q4 release, and it's -rc3 for now), with: >> xf86-video-intel: 2.6-branch. It's tagged as 2.5.99.2 for now. >> mesa: intel-2008-q4 branch. It's forked from master at some point >> (early Dec. 2008) and cherry-picked patches from master on demand, >> so a little more conservative than master. Of course master tip is >> supposed to work too, but not validated by Intel. libdrm: master >> branch. (note >2.4.2 is required for xf86-video-intel 2.6, and tip >> is recommended) >> kernel: Eric's drm-intel tree. For 2008Q4, we base on 2.6.28 kernel. >> So we are recommending drm-intel-2.6.28 branch, which adds 5 patches >> on top of 2.6.28. > > Can you put all the individual patches for 2.6.28 > available at http://intellinuxgraphics.org/2008Q4.html ?
Good suggestion. I'm putting the combination of the 6 patches with a link to "6 patches" on that page. Thanks Gordon _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
