On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:08:04AM -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
> Keyboard.c: In function 'xnestKeyboardProc':
> Keyboard.c:177: warning: passing argument 1 of 'XkbSetRulesDflts' from
> incompatible pointer type
> Keyboard.c:177: error: too many arguments to function 'XkbSetRulesDflts'
> Keyboard.c:178: warning: implicit declaration of function 
> 'XkbInitKeyboardDeviceStruct'
> Keyboard.c:178: warning: nested extern declaration of 
> 'XkbInitKeyboardDeviceStruct'
> Keyboard.c:206: warning: passing argument 1 of 'InitKeyboardDeviceStruct' 
> from incompatible pointer type
> Keyboard.c:206: warning: passing argument 2 of 'InitKeyboardDeviceStruct' 
> from incompatible pointer type5B
> Keyboard.c:122: warning: unused variable 'j'
> Keyboard.c:117: warning: unused variable 'modifier_keymap'
> Keyboard.c: In function 'xnestUpdateModifierState':
> Keyboard.c:227: error: 'struct _KeyClassRec' has no member named 'state'
> Keyboard.c:235: error: 'struct _KeyClassRec' has no member named 'state'
> Keyboard.c:256: error: 'struct _KeyClassRec' has no member named 'state'

Yeah, Xnest and Xdmx are broken, sorry.  That being said, we've talked a
lot about just deleting Xnest in favour of Xephyr: anyone got any
compelling counter-arguments?

Cheers,
Daniel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
xorg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

Reply via email to