2009/1/26 Thomas Dickey <[email protected]>: > On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Clemens Eisserer wrote: > >>>> I know that its not easy, but someone can't expect a step-by-step >>>> tutorial for such low-level stuff. >>> >>> hmm - the obvious conclusion is that xft is just a minor/useless library. >>> Perhaps it should be removed, then. >> The whole discussion is about RENDER's documentation, not xft. > > very well, then apply my comments to "RENDER" (they're both presented > as libraries that no one should try to use without some other library > as a sanitizing layer). > maybe i'm missing the point: what's the point in a library that needs another library in order to be used? i don't really think it's a good idea. maybe it would be better to better implement the library in order for it to be used without another sanitizing library, that would cost more resources.
-- dott. ing. beso _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
