On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 08:35:02PM +0000, Igor Mozolevsky wrote: > 2009/2/6 William Tracy: > > That creates a single point of failure--you are now relying on that > > person and that person only to get your patch in. That also does not > > give any third parties who might be impacted by your patch a chance to > > comment. > > > > Now, if any of the sub-projects were large enough to warrant their own > > mailing lists (which does not seem to be the case) then sending > > patches to those lists would make sense. > > So, since 1st Jan there's been, by my guestimate, around 2000 messages > on the xorg list... Are you seriously saying that that is a good way > of managing x.org development cycle and that nothing gets lost due to > the current SNR???
You appear to have a strange view of what constitutes signal and noise. Cheers, Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
