On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Jim Gettys <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 00:06 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:36:18PM +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> > the first one says that LBX is deprecated. however, has any >> > replacement for LBX been written _before_ deprecating it? has any >> > replacement been considered? >> >> Yes -- SSH.
> Please go right ahead and figure out the dependency you need. More > maintainers and developers are always welcome. hiya jim, hi daniel, thanks for responding. it's the npapi plugin capability that i want - the ability to plug in an arbitrary XWindows application into a web browser - not the X compression. it looks like LBX was utilised in rxr because it was not just a channel for x-window events but also for x-window authentication. it looks like rxr got chopped off at the knees (removal of LBX), and then grew another pair of legs (in the form of xnest) as there appears to be a _second_ plugin in rxr, called xnest-plugin, buti haven't yet been able to ascertain whether rxr/xnest-plugin is still dependent on lbx or not. so, if i manage to work it out, and cut out lbx, and go for "direct" running of commands to put into to xnest, it might _vaguely_ be possible to run ssh -X <remote system> but that's not really of interest to me: what's of interest to me is running _local_ x-applications (as the user who is running the web browser). if i work it out, i'll let you know - there'll be a new plugin to run x-windows apps embedded in web browsers. l. _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
