On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 09:31 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and McDonald, Michael-p7438c at 28/07/09 21:31 did gyre > and gimble: > > Hmm, the abstract for the Linux Plumbers Conference paper to be > > presented in September claims Shatter is an EXA extension and > > IntelLinuxGraphics 2.8 dropped EXA support. Doesn't sound like it'll > > help the 945 guys after all! :-) > > Nah, have faith, it will :) > > Shatter started off as EXA but it will move to UXA (UXA is basically > very similar to EXA but with a different memory manager and some other > gubbins I don't fully appreciate!).
Sure about that? Comparatively simple EXA improvements (e.g. eliminating software fallbacks from exaGlyphs when there's no mask) have yet to be ported to UXA after almost half a year. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.vmware.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
