On Saturday 19 December 2009, Simon Thum wrote: >Justin Piszcz wrote: >> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Lorenz Ruhmann wrote: >>> Is there a way to exactly reproduce this old behavior with the new code? >>> I don't like to rely on a scheme that is kinda considered obsolete. > >[..] > >> Yes, this is VERY annoying to me as well (all of the new acceleration >> methods except the old one): > >You're free to choose your annoyances. However, as the OP already found >out, scaling down is an important use case and when it doesn't work well >that's a bug. Reporting it generally gets better results than piling up >grudges. Your mileage may vary. > >> Add this to your: >> /etc/hal/fdi/policy/10-x11-input.fdi >> >> $ cat 10-x11-input.fdi >> <match key="info.capabilities" contains="input.mouse"> >> <merge key="input.x11_options.AccelerationScheme" >> type="string">lightweight</merge> </match> > >Obviously the OP knew how to switch back. I suppose he read the >documentation. BTW it's not obsolete, it's just broken for anything but >linear scaling (or none). > I would tend to agree. With modern high resolution mice, I have often wished I could set the gain to a below 1 condition. My mouse now uses about a 1" x1.35" area of the pad, to cover a 1680x1250 screen, so its way too fast for this user.
-- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) The NRA is offering FREE Associate memberships to anyone who wants them. <https://www.nrahq.org/nrabonus/accept-membership.asp> Mene, mene, tekel, upharsen. _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
