Aaron Plattner wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 01:02:35PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010 14:58:16 -0400, Geoffrey <[email protected]>
wrote:
Can you define 'viewable'?
From the X protocol glossary:
.LP
\fBViewable\fP
.IN "Viewable" "" "@DEF@"
.IP
A window is viewable if it and all of its ancestors are mapped.
This does not imply that any portion of the window is actually visible.
Graphics requests can be performed on a window when it is not viewable,
but output will not be retained unless the server is maintaining
backing store.
That seems misleading... the server makes a distinction between 'realized'
and 'viewable':
1. The root window is always realized.
2. A window is realized if it's mapped and its parent is realized.
3. A window is viewable if it's realized and its class is InputOutput.
SetInputFocus only checks that the window is realized, so it should work
with InputOnly windows. The comment is pretty fantastic:
/* It is a match error to try to set the input focus to an
unviewable window. */
if(!focusWin->realized)
return(BadMatch);
So something like this could well be producing this error?
if (ctrl->MODE == Browse) ClickButton (ctrl->b_create);
As the ClickButton would try and set focus on this window.
--
Until later, Geoffrey
"I predict future happiness for America if they can prevent
the government from wasting the labors of the people under
the pretense of taking care of them."
- Thomas Jefferson
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: [email protected]
