Kate Feng wrote: > To whom it may concern, > > On Thursday, July 22, 2010, I sent a patch for libXpm.a to the list > http://www.aps.anl.gov/epics/tech-talk/2010/msg00965.php
That message mentions using a libXpm source that's a decade or so out of date (libXpm 3.4k) - the latest libXpm release is libXpm 3.5.8 from last year: http://www.x.org/releases/individual/lib/libXpm-3.5.8.tar.bz2 > diff -u create.c.orig create.c > > --- create.c.orig 1998-03-19 14:51:00.000000000 -0500 > > +++ create.c 2010-05-20 09:42:41.000000000 -0400 > > @@ -929,8 +929,11 @@ > > if (attributes && (attributes->valuemask & XpmReturnAllocPixels)) { > > attributes->alloc_pixels = alloc_pixels; Your patch got double-spaced by your mailer so won't work - you might try sending as an attachment if you can't get your mailer to not break it. (I haven't looked to see if it's correct or not, was just obvious it couldn't be used in that format.) http://www.x.org/wiki/Development/Documentation/SubmittingPatches covers the preferred ways to send in patches to the mailing list. -- -Alan Coopersmith- [email protected] Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: [email protected]
