On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:56:04AM +0100, Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen wrote:
> Luc Verhaegen <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 03:02:58PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 03:43:07PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 06:36:32AM -0800, 
> >> > [email protected] wrote:
> >> > > --- Comment #4 from Daniel Stone <[email protected]> 2011-02-09 
> >> > > 06:36:31 PST ---
> >> > > done
> >> > 
> >> > Root access restored, i presume?
> >> 
> >> Yes.  Tollef's opinion was that quitting was a copout and that I should
> >> instead go fix some sitewranglers bugs instead.
> >
> > Until the next time you're drunk, i'm sure.
> 
> It sounds like you are saying that Daniel should be banned from further
> participation in xorg for life.

There is a huge difference between participation and being fully 
reinstated into a position that has been abused before.

> (If you do choose to make a case, take the time to make sure your
> arguments are well thought out before posting.  Remember, your arguments
> will have to sound convincing to a large number of people on this list,
> or you may as well not bother.)

All arguments were made, extensively, before.

Except maybe for one:

The claimed reason for reinstating daniels now is that apparently nobody 
else wants to take on an admin role at fd.o. I would like to know which 
known dependable community members were approached for such roles before 
this decision here was taken.

Luc Verhaegen.
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: [email protected]

Reply via email to