On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:56:04AM +0100, Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen wrote: > Luc Verhaegen <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 03:02:58PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 03:43:07PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > >> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 06:36:32AM -0800, > >> > [email protected] wrote: > >> > > --- Comment #4 from Daniel Stone <[email protected]> 2011-02-09 > >> > > 06:36:31 PST --- > >> > > done > >> > > >> > Root access restored, i presume? > >> > >> Yes. Tollef's opinion was that quitting was a copout and that I should > >> instead go fix some sitewranglers bugs instead. > > > > Until the next time you're drunk, i'm sure. > > It sounds like you are saying that Daniel should be banned from further > participation in xorg for life.
There is a huge difference between participation and being fully reinstated into a position that has been abused before. > (If you do choose to make a case, take the time to make sure your > arguments are well thought out before posting. Remember, your arguments > will have to sound convincing to a large number of people on this list, > or you may as well not bother.) All arguments were made, extensively, before. Except maybe for one: The claimed reason for reinstating daniels now is that apparently nobody else wants to take on an admin role at fd.o. I would like to know which known dependable community members were approached for such roles before this decision here was taken. Luc Verhaegen. _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: [email protected]
