On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:39:54AM -0800, Corbin Simpson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Luc Verhaegen <[email protected]> wrote: > > So it is better to leave this current situation as is, and have a major > > part of the infrastructure that X.org and others depend on what i > > honestly cannot describe as "a organization"? > > Well, after the outage a few years ago, we jokingly talked about > moving fd.o's stuff down to Corvallis, OR, where the Open Source Lab > could keep a closer eye on the machines. The ultimate reason for not > going down that route was that Portland was a better place as far as > having people who were actually involved with FreeDesktop nearby in > case of emergency. > > This is starting to sound like the kind of thing that should > definitely involve the rest of the fd.o members. If you have serious > concerns about the quality of hosting that fd.o's property is > receiving, then not just X.org, but all fd.o members need to be in > this discussion. > > ~ C.
Isn't libreoffice using fd.o? Luc Verhaegen. _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: [email protected]
