Hi,

Because of the naming change, it becomes difficult to create scripts to 
pe-configure display priority, resolution, position, and etc.
In my case, I have a device with Intel iGPU AMD dGPU, and I want to 
pre-configure display priority when more than one monitor are connected to the 
system.  In my own environment, I use xorg.conf and udev rules for hotplug 
detect, and it works because those names don’t change.  However, if I bring the 
device to work, configuration needs to be changed again for different monitors. 
 Further more, except for MST monitors causing name difference, I see different 
names when primary GPU is changed from one to another.  I don’t know if there 
are better solutions for this, to have designated output names for display 
interfaces.

Thanks and Regards,

David



> René Rebe <r...@exactcode.de> 於 2018年4月21日 上午12:09 寫道:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> On 19 Apr 2018, at 09:22, David Chen <david0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I have observed that when connecting display port with MST enabled monitor, 
>> display output name in xrandr becomes something like DP-2-8, and there are 
>> more output interfaces listed in xrandr.  I am wondering how those names are 
>> defined.
> 
> As far as I have seen this are the logical connection going over the port.
> 
> However, I wanted to chime in for two questions I wanted to ask for some time 
> already:
> 
> 1) i noticed the various open xorg drivers use different naming, could we 
> unify this in regards to dashes and counting 0 and 1 based?
> E.g. DP-0 vs DP1 on intel vs. nouveau vs. modesetting vs. amdgpu, etc?
> 
> Of course not such a big deal, but it is a bit annoying to hardcode things 
> based on machine types and such in my display setup shell script.
> 
> 2) I also have such an MST, Dell 4k display for some three years now. IIRC 
> only the modesetting driver does setup the two MST halfs correctly, when 
> using the -intel driver I have to manually xrandr --output … --left-of the 
> two “virtual screens” to get an output that covers the whole display.
> Any thoughts on this? Any plans to generically improve this or in the intel 
> driver?
> 
> Greetings,
>    René
> 
> -- 
> ExactCODE GmbH, Lietzenburger Str. 42, DE-10789 Berlin
> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com | 
> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
> 
_______________________________________________
xorg@lists.x.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: %(user_address)s

Reply via email to