Le 04/03/2019 à 18:18, Ilya Anfimov a écrit :
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 05:29:10PM +0100, Lucien Gentis wrote:
Le 04/03/2019 ?? 16:20, Ilya Anfimov a ??crit :
On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 06:09:02PM +0100, Lucien Gentis wrote:
[skipped]

we get scalable fonts with fields 7,8,12 at "0" like :

-bitstream-charter-medium-i-normal--0-0-75-75-p-0-iso8859-1
-dec-terminal-medium-r-normal--0-0-75-75-c-0-dec-dectech

but if we call :

XListFonts(serveur, "-*-*-*-*-*-*-0-*-*-*-*-*-*-*", 10000, &nbFonts);

we also get fonts with only field 7 at "0" like :

-bitstream-charter-bold-r-normal--0-120-100-100-p-0-iso8859-1
-adobe-new century schoolbook-bold-r-normal--0-120-100-100-p-0-iso10646-1

what about these fonts ?
   Well, X Logical Font Description Conventions
                  Version 1.5
                says (section 5):

    "For a scalable font source, a scalable font name for each
    character set is included in the list.  In addition to
    the scalable font name, specific derived instance names
    may also be included in the list."
    ...
    "Because some existing applications rely on seeing a collection
    of point and pixel sizes, server vendors are strongly
    encouraged in the near term to provide a mechanism for
    including, for each scalable font name, a set of specific
    derived instance names. For font sources that contain a set of
    specific derived instance names."

   So  it  is OK to have that in font list. It must be --0-0-  base
name for every such font, and if it is not -- there is  an  error
somewhere in your X server or font server, and probably should be
fixed. If there are base entries -- then you  don't need them.
But how to determine if a font is scalable or not when its fields 7, 8 and
12 are not at "0" ?
  Why do you need it?
  Usually you can safely assume, that this font is not scalable.

I don't really need it, existing choice is big enough !

But I only wanted to know the signification of "0" field in -adobe-new century schoolbook-bold-r-normal--0-120-100-100-p-0-iso10646-1

I did these (easy to reproduce) tests with xfontsel and xlsfonts commands :

*xfontsel :*

- if we select a point size of 120, it's impossible to select a pixel size of 0

- if we select a pixel size of 0, we only have the choice between * or 0 for point size

*xlsfonts :*

- xlsfonts -fn "-*-*-*-*-*-*-0-*-*-*-*-*-*-*" (pixel size of 0) : we can see scalable fonts and fonts like -adobe-new century schoolbook-bold-r-normal--0-120-100-100-p-0-iso10646-1

- xlsfonts -fn "-*-*-*-*-*-*-0-120-*-*-*-*-*-*" (pixel size of 0, point size of 120) : we can see fonts like -adobe-new century schoolbook-bold-r-normal--0-120-100-100-p-0-iso10646-1

- xlsfonts -fn "-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-120-*-*-*-*-*-*" (point size of 120) :we don't see anymore fonts like -adobe-new century schoolbook-bold-r-normal--0-120-100-100-p-0-iso10646-1, which is confusing because "-*-120-" also matches "-0-120-"



_______________________________________________
xorg@lists.x.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: %(user_address)s
_______________________________________________
xorg@lists.x.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: %(user_address)s

Reply via email to