Pavlin Radoslavov wrote: >> From what I have been able to test, it seems the hashing >> is more important for performance than the per-interface >> sockets, btw. >> > > Ben, > > I just committed the pif_index mapping optimization to CVS. > Please give it a try and let me know whether it works for you and > whether the speedup is in the ballpark you have seen in your testing > so far. > This look good. I can't notice any big difference in CPU from my hash implementation, and from a brief look at the new code, it seems you managed a cleaner implementation that I had :)
In the last test, all 30 of my virtual routers, with some 600 (virtual) interfaces in the machine total, all came up and negotiated OSPF to the 'Full' State. I need to do some more testing with dynamic changes, but certainly this is progress! Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
