Before sending the join_multicast_group XRL, the OSPF process is suppose to be registered by using the register_receiver XRL. If for some reason it has unregistered (e.g., by sending unregister_receiver) or because the FEA unregistered it on its own, then you will get the "not registered" error.
Hope that helps debugging the problem. Pavlin Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This could be caused by my changes to FEA, but I'm curious > if anyone knows what sorts of things could cause this message: > [ 2008/03/21 13:35:35 WARNING xorp_ospfv2:27182 OSPF area_router.cc:5759 > routing_router_link_transitV2 ] LSA in database MaxAge > Network-LSA: > LS age 3600 Options 0x2 DC: 0 EA: 0 N/P: 0 MC: 0 E: 1 LS type 0x2 Link State > ID 99.1.1.21 Advertising Router 127.1.0.21 LS sequence number 0x80000004 LS > checksum 0xc6d9 length 36 > Network Mask 0xffffff00 > Attached Router 127.1.0.21 > Attached Router 127.1.0.1 > Attached Router 127.1.0.11 > [ 2008/03/21 13:35:41 WARNING xorp_ospfv2:27182 OSPF area_router.cc:5759 > routing_router_link_transitV2 ] LSA in database MaxAge > Network-LSA: > LS age 3600 Options 0x2 DC: 0 EA: 0 N/P: 0 MC: 0 E: 1 LS type 0x2 Link State > ID 99.1.1.21 Advertising Router 127.1.0.21 LS sequence number 0x80000004 LS > checksum 0xc6d9 length 36 > Network Mask 0xffffff00 > Attached Router 127.1.0.21 > Attached Router 127.1.0.1 > Attached Router 127.1.0.11 > [ 2008/03/21 13:35:48 WARNING xorp_fea XrlFeaTarget ] Handling method for > raw_packet4/0.1/join_multicast_group failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed > Cannot join group 224.0.0.6 on interface 7.16.7 vif 7.16.7 protocol 89 > receiver [EMAIL PROTECTED]: not registered > [ 2008/03/21 13:35:48 FATAL xorp_ospfv2:27182 OSPF xrl_io.cc:640 > join_multicast_group_cb ] Cannot join a multicast group on interface 7.16.7 > vif 7.16.7: 102 Command failed Cannot join group 224.0.0.6 on interface > 7.16.7 vif 7.16.7 protocol 89 receiver [EMAIL PROTECTED]: not registered > (BAD_ARGS, CMD_FAILED, INTERNAL_ERR) > > > (I added the suggested work-around to keep ospf from asserting about > the LSA, but I'm hitting this a few minutes after those LSA asserts > would have happened, it seems.) > > Thanks, > Ben > > -- > Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com > > _______________________________________________ > Xorp-hackers mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
