On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 19:23, Pavlin Radoslavov <[email protected]> wrote: > Victor Faion <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hmm, when I changed the first parameter to be "fea" I get pretty much >> the same error, even though xorp_fea seems to startup: >> >> [ 2009/02/03 18:29:02 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:8229 RTRMGR +249 >> master_conf_tree.cc execute ] Changed modules: bpsf, interfaces, >> firewall, fea >> [ 2009/02/03 18:29:02 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:8229 RTRMGR +101 >> module_manager.cc execute ] Executing module: bpsf (bpsf/xorp_bpsf) >> [ 2009/02/03 18:29:02 INFO xorp_bpsf XrlBpsfTarget ] creating XrlBpsfNode >> [ 2009/02/03 18:29:02 INFO xorp_bpsf XrlBpsfTarget ] Starting up XrlBpsfNode >> [ 2009/02/03 18:29:02 WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:8229 XrlFinderTarget +407 >> ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling >> method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command >> failed Target "fea" does not exist or is not enabled. >> [ 2009/02/03 18:29:02 ERROR xorp_bpsf:8230 XrlBpsfTarget +277 >> xrl_bpsf_node.cc bind_cb ] Xrl Error: 201 Resolve failed >> [ 2009/02/03 18:29:04 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:8229 RTRMGR +101 >> module_manager.cc execute ] Executing module: interfaces >> (fea/xorp_fea) >> [ 2009/02/03 18:29:05 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] MFEA enabled >> [ 2009/02/03 18:29:05 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] CLI enabled >> [ 2009/02/03 18:29:05 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] CLI started >> [ 2009/02/03 18:29:05 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] MFEA enabled >> [ 2009/02/03 18:29:05 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] CLI enabled >> [ 2009/02/03 18:29:05 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] CLI started >> [ 2009/02/03 18:29:06 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:8229 RTRMGR +101 >> module_manager.cc execute ] Executing module: firewall (fea/xorp_fea) >> [ 2009/02/03 18:29:10 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:8229 RTRMGR +101 >> module_manager.cc execute ] Executing module: fea (fea/xorp_fea) >> [ 2009/02/03 18:29:16 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:8229 RTRMGR +2233 task.cc >> run_task ] No more tasks to run >> >> Not sure how to control the order of the process startups, seems the >> fea is starting after my process. > > You must add the following line in your bpfs.tp template file: > > %modinfo: depends fea; > > See some of the other protocol templates if in doubt about the > details. > >> I changed bind_cb to call listen directly. Does it matter that I call >> send_tcp_open_and_bind and send_tcp_listen on two different instances >> of XrlSocket4V0p1Client? I tried to declare XrlSocket4V0p1Client in >> the header and initialize it in the constructor but I got an error: >> "XrlSocket4V0p1Client does not name a type" > > No, it shouldn't matter even if you use two different instances. > For performance reasons though you might have a single instance in > the corresponding class so you can avoid the create/destroy > overhead. > In the header file for your class you must include the corresponding > xrl/interfaces/*.hh header file that declares class > XrlSocket4V0p1Client. > >> Also, I was passing in the instance of the eventloop to the >> constructor, but I guess I don't need to do this. Do I need to do >> anything directly with it besides call its run function in my main >> function? > > If you don't use the eventloop directly, then you don't need to pass > it. If you pass it, make sure you pass it by reference, because the > process cannot have more than one eventloop instances. > > Pavlin >
Sorry, I forgot about the template file. My little experiment is working, I should start making the protocol now. Many thanks once again! Victor _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
