Bruce Simpson wrote: > ... > The scope of the GPL was purely limited to individual routing processes, > not the core libraries, which are LGPL. The XRL RPC stubs don't actually > have an explicit license, and should probably be updated to reflect > either LGPL or public domain status. >
Correction: The generated RPC stubs contain a reference to the LGPL, but don't embed the license text itself. _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
