mahendra nunna wrote: > hi > > I want to modify the xorp. Considering the complexities involved in > the modification of native XORP code, it was proposed to use Java code > on top of XORP, Use interfaces and manage the XORP behaviour through > Java code. > It could either be done as > 1. Implementing the Java code and the native XORP code in the same > process, using Java Native Interface (Faster Processing) This seems like a bad idea...you'd have to understand Xorp well enough to bind to it, and then pay all the price of making JNI work on top of that. > 2. or having the java code and the native XORP code run in seperate > process, using Inter Process Communication. That might work, but probably painful to integrate with XRL since I don't think there is any automatic code generation for java.
I'd just copy something relatively simple (maybe rip?) and start hacking C++ code, but perhaps I'm biased! Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear <[email protected]> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
