Ben Greear wrote: >> >> [1] P.S. Ben: I'd be interested to know how you deal with the Finder >> namespace within your virtualization changes. Are you running a new >> set of XORP processes for each virtualized router, or sharing state >> within the existing processes -- or am I missing something? >> > I run a new set of xorp (rtrmgr) on unique FINDER ports and with > unique routing table.
Thanks for clarifying this. As you've probably seen, the Finder namespace is completely flat, and doesn't have any tuples or extension fields which would let us easily inject an instance field. However, implementing such is certainly possible. It's out of scope for now, though. cheers, BMS _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
