Bruce Simpson wrote: > > I did start on a xorp_backtrace() patch this week, however, it is a > total distraction from what I'm currently meant to be doing.
I got a ping back from the libexecinfo maintainers, and sent them a patch which aligns it with GLIBC's backtrace_symbols() output. On another note, I'm following up on thrift-users@ about some intermediate copies which don't go away with Thrift in RPC. Even so, with these copies, they are probably cheaper per cycle than the nested Xrl/XrlAtom/XrlArgs instances. I've sent them a patch for eliminating the copies from the write path, the read path needs a little bit more thinking about. later, BMS _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
