The problem with redistributing static to both ospf4 and ospf6 is like this: The two policies will ask RIB to add <ospfv2, tags="7"> and <ospfv3, tags="8"> into _policy_redist_map. But when static_routes pushed the route to RIB, in route (both ipv4 and ipv6) _policytags there is only 8 there. So RIB did not redistribute this static route into ospfv4.
Li --- On Fri, 12/11/09, Li Zhao <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Li Zhao <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Xorp-hackers] ospf4 and ospf6 can not apply export policy at > the same time > To: "Bruce Simpson" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Date: Friday, December 11, 2009, 1:32 PM > Bruce, what does a PolicyTag mean? > e.g. RIB was asked to add <ospfv2, tag=7> and > <ospfv3, tag=8> into _policy_redist_map. How the > source protocol > (e.g. static_routes) > uses that tag to mark routes I do not quite understand. > > Thanks. > > Li > > --- On Mon, 11/30/09, Bruce Simpson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > From: Bruce Simpson <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [Xorp-hackers] ospf4 and ospf6 can not > apply export policy at the same time > > To: "Li Zhao" <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected] > > Date: Monday, November 30, 2009, 6:05 PM > > Li Zhao wrote: > > > I noticed that if both ospf4 and ospf6 > redistribute > > static routes, ospf4 will fail to redistribute static > > routes. This is a bug. > > > > > > > Can you please raise this on XORP's Trac on > SourceForge, > > preferably with an appropriate test case, so someone > can get > > around to looking at it when there's free time to do > so? > > > > thanks, > > BMS > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xorp-hackers mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers > _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
