Yes, I am looking into why HAVE_PCAP is not defined in the config stage. I changed the build process for xorp source files. Also I built a proto type linux embedded system so I want to keep it stable for a while. Thirdly I am a dumbo to use svn development branch at this time stage.
But I will move to the main branch when I am ready soon. So temporarily now I will post the proper patches to this list. If i have too much patch to commit I will think about a better way. --- On Tue, 3/9/10, Ben Greear <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Ben Greear <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Xorp-hackers] VRRP error > To: "Li Zhao" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Date: Tuesday, March 9, 2010, 10:36 AM > On 03/09/2010 07:30 AM, Li Zhao > wrote: > > You are right. In my build "HAVE_PCAP" is not defined. > Do I need to turn > > on compile flag "HAVE_PCAP_SENDPACKET" too? > > You should figure out why it isn't defined by the configure > logic. > Probably it isn't installed or detected properly on your > system. > > Likely this just works in SVN and/or my branch. > > Sticking with 1.6 is going to keep you from taking > advantage of any bug fixes that other > folks put into the new code. It seems several people > are interested in VRRP, > so if you move to the development branch, it's likely you > can pool your > efforts by posting patches and discussing bugs you're > finding. > > I'll merge anything that looks useful into my tree in case > you want to > base off of it. > > If there are any technical reasons to not move to my tree > or SVN, please > let me know..maybe I can address them. > > Thanks, > Ben > > -- Ben Greear <[email protected]> > Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com > > _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
