On 31 March 2010 07:06, Ben Greear <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03/30/2010 10:55 PM, Adam Greenhalgh wrote: >> Hi Ben >> >> I think we need to have a discussion about what the best way to take >> patches from you is. Without tagging in xorp.ct, i think its going to >> be tricky to take a full patch from you without making mistakes. I am >> not sure that tagging is the best approach certainly isn't. Perhaps we >> need to have a xorp patches mailing list or upload location where the >> raw diff can be posted. Does anyone have any views on this ? > > I auto-generate email when I commit a patch. I can easily have it send > mail to some mailing list. > > That said, unless you really understand xorp, you may have difficulty > picking patches from my tree and making them work properly. I'm > still hoping I can push everything upstream at once and then fix any bugs that > pop up. I've found and fixed several recently for folks using xorp.ct > on older kernels and such. I'm sure there are more bugs, but there have > definitely been some successes too. > Pushing your entire tree is certainly one way to go, I guess the key issue is maintaining FreeBSD support along side Linux since I understand that most of your changes and focus is Linux related.
Adam _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
