On 04/28/10 20:12, Adam Greenhalgh wrote: > This looks reasonable to me given that it can be backed out for 1.8 , > if we choose collectively to go with some version of boost. >
No objection -- boost_regex *is* a large binary dependency _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
