I've often wondered whether this would be any good ? http://cxx.uclibc.org/index.html
Adam On 10 June 2010 08:21, saurabh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear Ben,BMS,atanu and all core members, > > First congregates for community version 1.8 of xorp.ct. > > I have been exploring various ways of getting xorp under 6 MB form 10 MB (of > my cutoff version) > (likely want 45% of further size reduction), but yield without conclusion. > > Are you or other core members are seeing any alternate solution to get xorp > upto this size ? This is now being barrier for my embedded target. (may many > like me facing such situations) > > As I see that xorp itself written in C++ with STL etc, eating lots > of space and memory, despite many of our size reduction patches. > > -Thanks > Saurabh > > _______________________________________________ > Xorp-hackers mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers > _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
