On 15/03/11 12:58, Matthew Jakeman wrote: > One problem we have is that because the async stuff Steven has > implemented was not originally in XORP we have implemented our prototype > using the original XORP code. This means that if we wanted to fully > integrate it into XORP properly, we will have the issue of porting the > code to the new style of coding.
I doubt this will be such a great problem. We dipped below the RPC abstraction in order to implement a kind of varargs behaviour, and the async changes are visible below that abstraction - but we can use the conditional typedefs and macros to remain compatible in both sync and async cases. -- _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
