On 06/14/2011 11:12 AM, Philip Hugg wrote: > On 14/06/2011 12:29 PM, Ben Greear wrote: >> On 06/14/2011 05:46 AM, Philip Hugg wrote: >> >>> I've included file 'topology.cc.patch'. Generated by >>> 'diff -uEw modified original > topology.cc.patch'. >>> Is this OK? >> >> You should put the original first to generate a proper patch, >> but I can fix that manually in this case. >> >> If you remember, can you describe what this fix fixes? >> >> Thanks, >> Ben >> >> > Ben, > > Sorry about the patch file. > > The modifications generally fixes and stabilizes the entries in the > OLSR's topology information base. > > Fix 1- File -> topology.cc, method-> update_tc_entry(...). > This was a programmatic fix. The code would find and set 'is_found = > true' on an entry that really > didn't exist. The modification now does a more precise check of the entry. > > Fix 2- method -> apply_tc_ansn(...) > This was an RFC fix. This seemed to have been forgotten during > implementation. See RFC section 9.5, > paragraphs 2 and 3. > > I hope this helps!
Thanks for the patches. I committed these and pushed them upstream. Thanks, Ben > Phil. > -- Ben Greear <[email protected]> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
