On 02/24/2012 01:01 PM, Jiangxin Hu wrote: > Recently I tested Xorp-OLSR for the scenario which nodes are belong to > different sub network. I got following errors in XORP log and routes are not > inserted > into kernel table. > The scenario is very simple. There are two nodes, one address is 10.0.0.2/24 > and another address is 10.0.2.3/24. > [ 2012/02/24 15:39:53.283729 ERROR xorp_rib:36 RIB rib/rib.cc:870 add_route ] > Attempting to add IGP route to table "olsr" (prefix 10.0.2.3/32 next-hop > 10.0.2.3): no directly connected interface toward the next-hop router > [ 2012/02/24 15:39:53.284476 WARNING xorp_rib XrlRibTarget ] Handling method > for rib/0.1/add_route4 failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Could not add > IPv4 > route net 10.0.2.3/32, nexthop: 10.0.2.3 to unicast RIB > [ 2012/02/24 15:39:53.285360 ERROR xorp_olsr4:38 OLSR > contrib/olsr/xrl_queue.cc:236 route_command_done ] callback: add_route: > ribname rib net 10.0.2.3/32 > nexthop 10.0.2.3 102 Command failed Could not add IPv4 route net 10.0.2.3/32, > nexthop: 10.0.2.3 to unicast RIB > Is it a configuration error or it is a implementation limitation?
Does this work with another routing protocol like OSPF? OLSR is not that well tested and I know it has at least some bugs in more complex network topologies. Thanks, Ben > Thanks, > Jiang > > > _______________________________________________ > Xorp-hackers mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers -- Ben Greear <[email protected]> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
