On 06/01/2012 01:33 PM, Igor Maravić wrote: >> >> It will lead to an error just like original XORP, the error will be "no >> direct connected interface ..." I guess. >> > > Well the BGP doesn't agree. With your changes route resolution for BGP > will be broken. > > I think that better solution would be to add function that forces > adding of direct route. Something like add_connected_route. > > Then You should think a way to call that function from OLSR, and all > other protocols that need such route resolution.
Igor: Why should we ever restrict adding the connected routes? It seems to me that if the routing protocol wants it added, fea should just do so. But maybe I'm missing something? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear <[email protected]> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ Xorp-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
