Hi Antal, > Due to the recent clock changes > (https://github.com/roboterclubaachen/xpcc/commit/4b67b08ffddeb608df3d90c0595cd21125c891db) > there are now conflicts between develop and > feature/stm32f103_support_experimental, so now I'm not even able to > easily merge the new changes.
Yes, sorry, that was kind of unavoidable. I had to modify the clock control changes so they work with the other chips and the old system clocks as well. > Now that it's easier to manually configure the clocks, I think it > would make sense to add the device and linker files (and whatever else > is needed) for stm32f103 to develop, so it can be used without > experimental features (but for now only with manual clock config). > > What are your thoughts? That’s exactly the plan! :-) I want to cherry-pick and amend the commits from the experimental branch to a separate feature branch and then add an example for the NUCLEO-F103 with the manual clock config in `Board::initialize()`. It might take until the weekend though, so if you already have a feature branch with F103 support by then, I will use that. Cheers, Niklas _______________________________________________ xpcc-dev mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://mailman.rwth-aachen.de/mailman/listinfo/xpcc-dev