I published my blog post on extracting and using this data here, btw:

On 13. Feb 2018, at 02:31, Szabó Antal 
<szabo.antal...@gmail.com<mailto:szabo.antal...@gmail.com>> wrote:

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 10:54 PM, Niklas Hauser
<niklas.hau...@rwth-aachen.de<mailto:niklas.hau...@rwth-aachen.de>> wrote:
The advantage of the CMSIS header files over the SVD files is that everyone
actually uses them to compile code.
The SVD files originally were only for the Keil IDE debugger to assign
meaning to IO memory addresses.
They therefore aren't required to be completely accurate, which is a

So do you think it would be a good idea to generate Rust register
definitions (or whatever these are called) from the headers instead of
SVD files?

Yeah, it wasn't my best talk, I'm not practiced enough to handle such a
complex topic.
I'm currently writing a very long blog post about modm, going into all the
details of it.

Looking forward to reading it!

That's based on this proof-of-concept implementation:

The CubeMX data does contain real clock graphs, which are used as the data
model behind the Clock Configuration tab in CubeMX, however they didn't
contain the _full_ clock graph.
So I added it manually for the F100 and designed an experimental API. But I
didn't find a good API for it in the end.

Ah, I knew about these, I just thought you made a new version that works better.

xpcc-dev mailing list
xpcc-dev mailing list

Reply via email to