On 7 Sep 2001, Pontus Lidman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I assume that it is legal to extend the WindowOptRec structure (in
> windowstr.h) with extension-specific data, such as the Shape extension
> does. However, windowstr.h is included in many places, and not all of
> these have $(XTOP)/include/extensions in the include path when
> compiling, so it's a bit hard to include the extension-specific
> structures.
>
> Would a patch to add $(XTOP)/include/extensions to the necessary
> include paths be accepted, or is there a design decision here that I'm
> not aware of?
I'm not sure that it *is* legal to do that, at least without discussion
with the X Open Group.
Essentially windowstr.h is not an XFree86 file, but part of the common
X server code.
--
Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna
_______________________________________________
Xpert mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert