Michel D�nzer wrote: > On Tue, 2001-10-23 at 07:54, Matthew Reppert wrote: > > >>Now, let me say one thing; I've run two different kernels on this >>system: 2.4.10 and 2.4.12. Note #1: my /usr/include/linux and >>/usr/include/asm were NOT FHS compliant ... because I'd copied >>the data into those directories. Note #2: I did this back when >>I was running 2.4.10. Well, today I noticed this, kicked myself in >>the arse a few times, and made the proper symlinks ... recompiled >>just now and X seems to work fine. Heck, Quake 3 runs nice ... ^^; >> > >>From FHS 2.3: > > 6.1.7 /usr/include : Header files included by C programs > > These symbolic links are required if a C or C++ compiler is > installed and only for systems not based on glibc. > > /usr/include/asm -> /usr/src/linux/include/asm-<arch> > /usr/include/linux -> /usr/src/linux/include/linux > > > So your system isn't based on glibc? I think you've found out the hard > way why these really shouldn't be symlinks.
... you know, that's a good point. I *am* glibc-based, 2.2.x. Interesting; well, it may have had to do with some of the stuff I defined in host.def, though I can't really see what it would be ... I'll look into it when I have more time (sometime later this week). Still suspect the headers. And why not symlinks? Matt _______________________________________________ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
