Frank Kujawski said...
|
|I was wondering what solution would be best for multi-head displays.
|Would it be a card that supports dual heads or two cards?
|I suppose the next question is what would be done on the screens, a
|primary high res workspace for office type issues and a secondary low res
|for picutres/movies etc. A second option is for both monitors to be the
|primary work space and for windows to move natraly between the two.
|What type of cards would work best for each situation and why?
I've been kind of boggled that this is
such a big deal. In 1992, I was running
the Graphics Product Verification Test
(PVT) lab at IBM/Austin for the R/S 6000
line. We did a lot of multi-head testing,
including on occasion one of every type of
graphics adapter we could cram into a big
box. I recall more than once running six
diverse adapters together, including a B/W
and their big dog 3D engine, and various
things in between. We tested them as
separate displays, and as screens of one
display. It tended to all work pretty
seamlessly. Pretty amazing, and *very*
cool. [1]
So was this just IBM's heavily modified
X server, or was this based on common,
multi-head code. Why is this not readily
available in XFree86? Is it the limitations
of the PC architecture?
Thanks,
Miles
[1] I was a contractor, not an employee
of IBM. No vested interest, etc.
_______________________________________________
Xpert mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert