<snip> > The strange thing is that if I force the chipset as a cyberbladeXPAi1, > which is what it should be, then it does not work. I wonder if this > is a bug or something is wrong with my setup.
How about this as a clue: On my 1805-274 when I look at Windoze XP the chip is reported as a CyberBladeXPAi1, but when I boot up Linux the chip is detected as a CyberBladeXPm. And if that weren't confusing enough The Toshiba Web site system specification sheet (pdf) lists the graphics chip as a "Trident CyberAladdin-T graphics controller." The Trident web page says the Trident CyberAladdin-T is a "CyberBladeXP combined with an Acer Laboratories's North Bridge (M1651T)" to provide a "...new generation of low-power integrated graphics and core logic supporting the latest Intel Pentium� III-M (Tualatin) processor family." while a CyberBladeXPAi1 combines "Trident's 2D/3D graphics core (BLADE 3D[tm]) and Acer Laboratories ' North Bridge (M1641)" to provide a "...low-power integrated graphics and core logic supporting Intel's Pentium� III and Celeron[tm] processor family." So now at least on my box I am unclear as to a) what the graphics Chip really is and b) how much difference the confusion in a) matters when it cones to picking a driver. What a mess! > I hope that this is useful for those who are still struggling to get > their video configuration with this chip. I too would like to see you config file. dlg [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
