On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 03:46:48PM -0800, James Simmons wrote: > > > BTW one of the ideas for handling topology I like is the idea of having > > > different groups for different desktops for multi-desktop systems. You > > > could have desktop0, desktop1 etc. This way you don't end up playing > > > a mp3 on someone else sound card. You can have multiple sound cards as > > > well and you can assign each one to a particular group. Same with > > > joysticks etc. > > > > Yes, this sounds good. It's an userspace thing, though. Our job now is > > just to allow it. :) > > Correct. That is a SysAdmins job. > > > > Only for things that make sense. For example the force feedback state > > > might be nice to have per process. Hm, does XInput handle states per > > > client? > > > > I'm not sure about FF. I can't imagine sharing a FF device by more than > > one client process. What if the forces are contradictory? > > We have to change the hardware state as we go from one client to another. > Say we have two different games going each with their own state. Actually > thinking about it now it is a dumb idea. We don't know what window would > have focus so it would be better if the X input library would handle this.
Exactly. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs _______________________________________________ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
