On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Keith Packard wrote:

> 
> Around 14 o'clock on Mar 10, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> 
> >    I've attached a modified version of the original restest.c
> > program which uses it.
> 
> Is there a good reason not to place 'restest' in the distribution?  
> Perhaps with a better name?

   I think restest is not very polished.  I'm not sure what the
best way to present this information is.  One could probably do
alot more than what restest does.

                                Mark.

_______________________________________________
Xpert mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert

Reply via email to