shouldn`t we follow a standard gnu packaging convention as
package-name-major.minor.sub.tar.gz?
i`m sure you realise that following standarts is useful, and i think you must
have a reason to not adopt a most widely-used, and even more, GNU standart of naming.
after all it simplifies scripting for people, etc etc :)regards, Samium Gromoff _______________________________________________ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
