On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Dirk [ISO-8859-1] St�ffler wrote: > On my system, any one of the three options > Option "XaaNoOffscreenPixmaps" > Option "XaaNoPixmapCache" > Option "XaaNoScreenToScreenCopy" > prevents the display from corrupting. By the way, it's REALLY difficult > to find three things if you're sure you're looking for only one. > Question to the experts: Which one costs least performance?
> Switching from 16bpp to 24bpp is said to cure the problem, too (Laurent > Montel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ). I couldn't really verify this, > because X doesn't let me have 1280x1024@85Hz in 24bpp depth, probably > due to some dacspeed default in the i810 driver. At 75Hz it works, > though. I didn't want to fiddle with this, but Intel says explicitly > that i810 supports these 85Hz-settings at this depth. Is there something > wrong with the defaults here? Ah. I've always used 24bpp. I've been using "DacSpeed 230" on my i815 for a couple of years. > After having done all this work, I hope someone will be interested > enough to take up the case at this point. Afraid I'm not yet interested. -- Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna _______________________________________________ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
