On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Preetham wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 05:59:41 -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Jul 2002, Preetham wrote:
> >
> > > Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> > >
> > > can i change
> > > the code to
> > > write only into a system memory instead of the framebuffer.
> >
> >     You want a hardwareless X-server?  The virtual framebuffer
> > server in the XFree86 tree is that.  It just creates a framebuffer
> > in system memory and has no capability to display it.
> Yes, a hardwareless X-server is what i am looking for.
> where can i get the virtual framebuffer source from. I have downloaded
> the source from the CVS repository.

   It's in there someplace.  I've never built it.

> Can i use this virtual framebuffer server in conjunction with another
> Driver that uses a Hardware device.

    The virtual framebuffer server has no drivers.  It's a virtual
X-server.  You can probably run it in the background while you're
running XFree86 though.

> if so, Who(in the XServer) decides which driver is called i.e, can i send
> one X client
> connection to the virtual framebuffer and another Xclient connection
> to the Hardware device.

   It's not a driver, it's a separate server.  If you want an app to
connect to that one instead you set the DISPLAY environment variable.

   If instead, you want a single X-server with two screens - one
in hardware and one on virtual hardware you should probably look
into the vnc module that Alan mentioned earlier in this thread.


                        Mark.
_______________________________________________
Xpert mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert

Reply via email to